stuffparty! RSS

Wherein stuff! is tumbled. A tumblelog by Karl Gunnarsson.

Oh, and I also edit a photography blog here on Tumblr called 1/125. Go check it out.

If you're looking for ultimate enlightenment you'd be doing yourself a grave disservice by asking me about stuff.

Archive

Apr
30th
Thu
permalink
Ryan, It’s logical to have a D3 as a backup. The D700 is lighter and ergonomic, which would cover the majority of shots more comfortably. The D3 would be a great back up for when you need to do some heavy shooting. Like, lets say you are shooting a wedding and, suddenly, there’s a zombie armageddon. In that case, most would want to use a D3 because the battery lasts longer and the use of two cf cards makes it less likely to lose your pictures, due to a corrupted card. Also, the D3 is more likely to be usable after taking an impact from a camera strike hard enough to kill a zombie, although the D700 could probably handle that, as well…maybe it might even be better for killing zombies with mb-10 attached. That leads me to my next question, what camera do you guys think would be better for killing zombies, a D3 or a D700 with the MB-10 grip?